Thursday, November 09, 2006

Will they, won't they?

Will they, won't they?
TIMES NEWS NETWORK

9 Nov, 2006 0143hrs IST

HUBLI: The Hubli-Dharwad traffic police seem to be tripping on their toes as regards the experiment to ban movement of manganese and iron-ore laden trucks on city roads during daytime. In the last three years, the police
have mooted the ban time and again but failed to put it into practice, thanks to the tactful lobbying of truckers' union.

The latest experiment to impose a ban on movement of heavy trucks between 7 am and 11 pm, which had come in for appreciation, now looks to be meeting the same fate if one goes by the developments at the meeting between Karnataka state lorry owners' association and police on Monday.

Citing the developments at the meeting, association presidents said police commissioner Narayan Nadamani have given a formal assurance to relax the ban except during school hours. The assurance came after the association office-bearers told him that they were ready to withdraw their stir against the ban from November 10.

While top police officials are worried that all efforts made to restrict the entry of heavy trucks during daytime will go in vain if the ban is relaxed, residents are apprehensive that the traffic scenario in Hubli-Dharwad may return to the square one.

They have reason too. When a similar ban on trucks was imposed during the tenure of previous police commissioners, the truckers had managed to bring pressure on them and get the ban relaxed. In fact, the residents here had
wholeheartedly welcomed the move when the ban was imposed as it reduced the traffic load by nearly 30 per cent on city roads.

It was not only the residents, but even policemen in lower ranks, who were weary of regulating traffic, had heaved a sigh of relief. Interestingly, the state truckers' association had once again offered to chip in Rs 1 crore to develop an alternate road between Gadag Road and PB Road.

About six months ago, the association had also promised to contribute to road works after the HDMC passed a resolution seeking a ban on movement of trucks in the city.

Moved by the association's magnanimity, the HDMC had incorporated a plan to develop the alternative road under build-own operate-transfer(BOOT) basis at a cost of Rs 4 crore. But they backtracked at the eleventh hour citing some reasons.

Meanwhile, various organisations in Hubli-Dharwad have threatened to launch an agitation if the police relax the ban. "We are aware that the truckers are trying various means to get the police to relax the ban. We would not tolerate any move by the police to withdraw or relax the ban", said Laxman Korapatti of City Ambedkar Association.

Twin cities lose out on central scheme

Twin cities lose out on central scheme
MANU AIYAPPA -TIMES NEWS NETWORK

9 Nov, 2006 0129hrs IST

HUBLI: The twin cities of Hubli-Dharwad have suffered yet another setback on the development front. The Union urban development ministry has rejected the state government's renewed proposal to include Hubli-Dharwad under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) stating that it will set a precedence for other states to make similar proposals.

Chief minister H D Kumaraswamy was informed about this when he met Union urban development minister Jaipal
Reddy in New Delhi on Tuesday. The only silver lining: Reddy has agreed to release more funds to the state to compensate for hold-up.

The development has obviously irked residents of the twin cities by and large since they had pinned hopes on AICC chief Sonia Gandhi. Addressing a public rally in Bangalore on September 3 to welcome former deputy chief minister Siddaramaiah into the Congress fold, party president Sonia Gandhi had announced the inclusion of Hubli-Dharwad under
JNNURM describing it as a gift to the people of Karnataka.

"This is really bad news. The politicians are playing with sentiments of people for their political gain. Sonia Gandhi, holding such a responsible position, should have consulted the concerned minister before making
it public", an aggrieved resident Anil M Desai said.

Ruing on the setback, another resident Sunil Pujar sounded a bit caustic, "We, the people of north Karnataka, are used to such setbacks and it's high time we learnt a few lessons. We are doing well without being included in such schemes. Let us all move ahead as a cohesive unit. Let's work together for our cities. It is better we stop relying on our public representatives for the betterment of cities and towns."

Some Non-Resident Indians, who had launched an e-crusade to demand the inclusion of Hubli-Dharwad under JNNURM, were also disappointed. Some natives of Hubli-Dharwad residing overseas had also volunteered to launch a chain of protest by observing day-long fast to express their solidarity, to insist that the Union government include the twin-cities under JNNURM.

"Through our e-movement, we thought we would send a strong signal to the Union government. But it is really unfortunate that it has not happened", rued some NRIs. Their anguish is also made known on a group site. Under the JNNURM, the Centre had first selected Bangalore from Karnataka under the category of metros with 4 millionplus population. It had asked the state government to send proposals regarding heritage and other cities with 5-15 lakh population.

Former chief minister Dharam Singh sent a letter on November 29, 2005, requesting the Union urban ministry to include the twin cities under the scheme. But bowing to political pressure, Dharam Singh again wrote on December 7, 2005, to the Union government urging him to include Hubli-Dharwad and Gulbarga along with Mysore.

This virtually spoiled the show as the guidelines of the mission clearly stated that only one city should be recommended under the 'C' category. Singh overlooked them, and as a result, the steering committee decided to go by the initial list. This attracted widespread protest from various quarters.

As a damage control exercise, Sonia Gandhi, during her visit to Bangalore, assured the people of Karnataka that Hubli-Dharwad would be included under JNNRUM once again, reviving the hopes of residents here.